Link to sectionAccessibility Experience & Sentiment
The accessibility features mentioned in this year's survey proved to be straightforward enough to use, which translated into a very low negative sentiment overall.
Group by:
Sort by:
Experience
- Used it: Respondents who have used an item.
- Heard of it: Respondents who have heard about an item, but haven't used it.
- Never heard of it: Respondents who have never heard about an item.
Sentiment
- Positive: Respondents who are interested in learning more about a technology; or are willing to use it again.
- Neutral: Responents who did not indicate any sentiment about a technology.
- Negative: Respondents who are not interested in learning more about a technology; or have used it and had a negative experience.
Link to sectionHandicaps des utilisateurs
It was comforting to see developers account for a wide range of disabilities while making websites, with visual disabilities taking the top ranks.
Link to sectionAutres techniques d'accessibilité
It's nice to see that alt text is widely implemented, and if nothing else this chart can serve as a handy shortlist of accessibility patterns to implement in your own projects.
Link to sectionLecteurs d'écran
It should come as no surprise that developers are more likely to use screenreaders if they come bundled with their browser or OS.
Link to sectionOutils d'accessibilité
Lighthouse and browser devtools in general topped the rankings, overtaking more specialized tools such as Axe or WAVE.
Link to sectionPoints sensibles de l'accessibilité
Accessibility presents a unique challenge in that developers must not only overcome technical issues such as testing difficulties, but also organizational obstacles such as low prioritization or lack of client demand.
Link to sectionRessources Recommandées
