Link to sectionAccessibility Experience & Sentiment
The accessibility features mentioned in this year's survey proved to be straightforward enough to use, which translated into a very low negative sentiment overall.
Group by:
Sort by:
Deneyim
- Used it: Respondents who have used an item.
- Heard of it: Respondents who have heard about an item, but haven't used it.
- Never heard of it: Respondents who have never heard about an item.
Duygu
- Pozitif: Bir teknoloji hakkında daha fazla bilgi edinmek isteyen veya bu teknolojiyi tekrar kullanmak isteyen katılımcılar.
- Nötr: Bir teknoloji hakkında herhangi bir duygu belirtmeyen yanıtlayıcılar.
- Negatif: Bir teknoloji hakkında daha fazla bilgi edinmekle ilgilenmeyen veya bu teknolojiyi kullanmış ve olumsuz bir deneyim yaşamış katılımcılar.
Link to sectionEngelli Kullanıcılar
It was comforting to see developers account for a wide range of disabilities while making websites, with visual disabilities taking the top ranks.
Link to sectionDiğer Erişilebilirlik Teknikleri
It's nice to see that alt text is widely implemented, and if nothing else this chart can serve as a handy shortlist of accessibility patterns to implement in your own projects.
Link to sectionEkran Okuyucular
It should come as no surprise that developers are more likely to use screenreaders if they come bundled with their browser or OS.
Link to sectionErişilebilirlik Araçları
Lighthouse and browser devtools in general topped the rankings, overtaking more specialized tools such as Axe or WAVE.
Link to sectionErişilebilirlik Sıkıntı Yaratan Noktalar
Accessibility presents a unique challenge in that developers must not only overcome technical issues such as testing difficulties, but also organizational obstacles such as low prioritization or lack of client demand.
Link to sectionRecommended Resources
